# Core Contributor Sprint Retro - 29 October - 12 November

**URL:** <https://discuss.openedx.org/t/core-contributor-sprint-retro-29-october-12-november/8726>\
**Category:** Core Contributors\
**Tags:** core-sprints, retrospective\
**Created:** [November 15, 2022, 10:19am UTC](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/core-contributor-sprint-retro-29-october-12-november/8726 "2022-11-15T10:19:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sarina](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.openedx.org/sarina/32/2308_2.png) [@sarina](https://discuss.openedx.org/u/sarina)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 2:05pm UTC](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/core-contributor-sprint-retro-29-october-12-november/8726/2 "2022-11-15T14:05:29Z")

</div>

Hi! I’m sorry I missed reporting, I was on holiday on Friday and missed the ping.

Per [\*\*More Repos.\*\* As a core committer already in the program, I would like write-access to more repositories, in order to increase my contributions and meet my CC goals. · Issue #173 · openedx/open-edx-proposals · GitHub](https://github.com/openedx/open-edx-proposals/issues/173#issuecomment-1314691835) I’d like to quickly bring up the proposal for Core Contributors to propose logical repo “groupings” (groups that it’d be common for other Core Contributors to apply to, such as a particular set of XBlocks, or a feature repo + associated libraries). My idea would be these groupings wouldn’t necessarily mean you have a history of contributing to every single one, but your performance in a few of the repos would be a good proxy for proving you understood the whole group.

@arbrandes @brian.smith and I have been discussing grouping MFE repos in such a way and in @BrianMesick 's nomination we provided some groups for Analytics repos.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/core-contributor-sprint-retro-29-october-12-november/8726)._
