# Open edX Contributors Meetup

**URL:** <https://discuss.openedx.org/t/open-edx-contributors-meetup/1450>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [February 20, 2020, 12:15pm UTC](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/open-edx-contributors-meetup/1450 "2020-02-20T12:15:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 89

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![antoviaque](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.openedx.org/antoviaque/32/32_2.png) [@antoviaque](https://discuss.openedx.org/u/antoviaque)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2022, 1:11pm UTC](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/open-edx-contributors-meetup/1450/89 "2022-03-24T13:11:54Z")

</div>

@jalondonot Thanks! Great recap, especially of the points of the sprints retro – I posted it and replied about its elements at:

> [@Core Contributor Sprint Retro - March 4-18th](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/core-contributor-sprint-retro-march-4-18th/6876/4):
>
> We discussed the three blockers with the most votes during the [last Contributors meetup](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/open-edx-contributors-meetup/1450/87#h-5-improvements-and-blockers-retrospective-8) on Tuesday – @jalondonot did an amazing job summing them up in the meeting recap: We agreed to see how it goes, as well as to encourage bringing up any blocker or issue around CC work. =\> I posted a question related to this in the OEP, about whether maintainers would be required to provide reviews: [https://github.com/openedx/open-edx-proposals/pull/290#discussion\_r834141344](https://github.com/openedx/open-edx-proposals/pull/290#discussion_r834141344) . And see also [https://github.…](https://github.com/openedx/open-edx-proposals/pull/290#discussion_r834091497)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.openedx.org/t/open-edx-contributors-meetup/1450)._