Hi @regis and @ghassan We work to integrate the runtime configuration feature in the MFE and create the corresponding PRs, this is the current state: Fronted-app-account - merged (and available in olive) Frontend-app-profile - pending review Frontend-app-gradebook - pending review Frontend-a…

@dcoa I have tried the to use/run the learning PR but got an error, so left a comment :. Secondaly for other MFEs, does it only require to update frontend-platform to at least 2.5.0 so it can benefit from config API? for example frontend-app-course-authoring ref is already using 2.5.1 does that m…

Thanks, I’ll check your comment in the learning app. Secondaly for other MFEs, does it only require to update frontend-platform to at least 2.5.0 so it can benefit from config API? for example frontend-app-course-authoring ref is already using 2.5.1 does that make it work with the config API? Y…

I took the liberty to move this conversation to a separate topic so as not to hijack the previous conversation on Tutor plugins and the Olive release. It looks like we will have a very long list of MFEs in Olive: Olive: list of new MFEs · Issue #200 · openedx/build-test-release-wg · GitHub So I’m …

Ohh boy, that is a lot of MFEs. I’m a little unsettled by the fact that even though the backend API was merged Months ago and that we have the account app working with this since August we have not made progress in merging more support for this. Also we have not been able to convince any of the tea…

[image] Felipe: Also we have not been able to convince any of the teams working on those MFEs to add support for this. This is a problem, obviously. It is essential that we get this feature in Olive, otherwise we will not be able to include all these new MFEs. @e0d @nedbat can you help us get…

[image] regis: a very long list of MFEs in Olive [image] Felipe: Ohh boy, that is a lot of MFEs. Hold on, folks! Just because some MFEs got Olive branches does not mean we have to include them in Tutor! As tutor-mfe maintainer and tCRIL’s frontend guy, I took the liberty of assigning…

PS: The new Discussions MFE is worth taking a serious look at . The developers are doing their best to have it ready ASAP. They’re saying “early November”, so it should be theoretically possible to include it.

[image] regis: [image] Felipe: Also we have not been able to convince any of the teams working on those MFEs to add support for this. This is a problem, obviously. It is essential that we get this feature in Olive, otherwise we will not be able to include all these new MFEs. @e0d @nedbat …

+1 to everything @arbrandes has said. [image] arbrandes: TLDR: Let’s consult the Product Working Group as well. There are product considerations to take into account. Ultimately, I think the list will be narrowed down a lot by them. I’m not saying they have ultimate say, but it doesn’t make se…

[image] arbrandes: Do we need to include every MFE in that list in Tutor/Olive? TLDR: No. Absolutely agree. However we must start offering support for runtime configuration if we ever want to enable those MFEs in the open-release. Given how long it took to merge those PRs in the first 4 repo…

MFE runtime configuration

Working Groups Build-Test-Release

Topic		Replies	Views
Microfrontends: a retrospective Development	19	3319	February 15, 2022
Problems applying Customised MFE libraries (eg "frontend-platform") to a production Open edX platform (using "tutor local") Tutor Help mfe , tutor-mfe	22	4600	December 17, 2023
Development work coordination and conflict resolution Collaborative Proposals	12	1161	July 26, 2020
Deploying MFEs in the community Build-Test-Release mfe	25	6123	November 10, 2020
Frontend Pluggability Summit Architecture javascript , mfe , extensibility	36	2346	November 2, 2023

MFE runtime configuration

Related topics