Thanks for your work Xavier, I think it’s great that we have a more precise definition of what counts as core contributor work. It’s also great that participation in the various Tutor projects also counts towards CC work.
Do you think that having better scoped roles will allow us to stop evaluating CC participation in terms of number of hours of work? If we can track CC work through issues, then surely it’d be better to evaluate core contributors based on the issues they help resolve? For instance, we could assign complexity tags to each issue (easy/medium/hard/nightmare) and count for each CC the number of closed issues. This would be a much better proxy for participation in the CC program than work time.