Is Anyone Working on LTI 1.3?

good morning all! :sun_with_face::parrot::sunflower: curious if anyone has implemented LTI 1.3? any suggestions on reading materials, repos or other useful resources?

1 Like

Hi @lpm0073 :wave:t2:

We did a technical discovery on building an LTI 1.3 consumer XBlock, if this can help. We’re looking for people who would be willing to contribute to funding the effort :slight_smile:


marvelous news!!! thank you @gabrieldamours. i’ll review and confer with my client at Rice/Querium. they’ll likely be thrilled to collaborate with others on this.

1 Like

@lpm0073 do you know if anyone is working on LTI 1.1 (as opposed to 1.1.1)?

Bryan Wilson (@Appsembler) is working on such support:

It might sound weird, because that’s one minor version less that v1.1.1, but it’s actually needed to support one big LTI provider that is ScormCloud.

i’ve been working on LTI 1.1 for the last few weeks. i’m beginning a project on monday that will use LTI 1.3 (wish me luck :confused: )

Thanks @lpm0073, I think we should work together on this issue. The LTI XBlock should support different standards out of the box.

I’m interested to know what have you done so far on 1.1 and how do you plan to tackle 1.3?

@bryanlandia is leading the v1.1 support in our team.

I would like to know where can I read about supporting LTI 1.3.
I self-hosted an Ironwood release and successfully integrated with LTI and I found that LTI 1.1.1 has been supported. However I would like to know whether LTI 1.3 can be integrated.

@Roshni_X Yes, there have been discussions about adding support for LTI 1.3 - cf the current thread, to which I’m moving this message.

@lpm0073 @omar Any update on this?

@marcotuts Do you have LTI 1.3 on a roadmap, and if so could you share details on edX plans for LTI 1.3?

1 Like

Hello everyone!

We are picking up a project we hope soon relating to LTI v1.3 support for the Consumer xBlock. There is also an open pull request to add LTI v1.3 support for the provider infrastructure.

If you are interested in doign development in this space it would be great to coordinate! We have a list of additional follow-on capabilities relating to LTI as well (including support for the deep linking spec to improve the experience for existing LTI consumer xBlocks.

If you are doing active devlopment here or plan to in the next month please let me know and we can find a way to coordinate this!

1 Like

Hi @marcotuts. Glad to hear you are working on LTI v1.3…any idea on timing for when it will be available for us to connect a tool provider? End of 2020?

Hi Drew,

Thankfully this should be available much sooner than the end of 2020! The team is working on this now but I expect an update to this post with the latest in 3-6 weeks.

Do you / your instance / etc make frequent use of this xblock? Any suggestions or asks more generally about this tool?