Quick reminder for core contributors, to remember to fill the sprint check-ins, before the end of the day today.
You should have received an email on Tuesday & Wednesday from “Friday <hello@mg.fridayfeedback.com>” titled “Core contributors - Sprint Retrospective & Planning: please add an update”. Please fill it today!
If someone wants to help with some of the steps of organizing the core contributors sprints, don’t hesitate to let me know — there is plenty to do, and I’m happy to share
Since we have only 4 improvements/blockers mentioned this week, we can directly look into all of them (if you still want a vote in these cases though, let me know):
Improvement/blocker
Author
For me It’s difficult to join the Transifex WG meeting (because of the time and other meeting planned before)
- Still too few answers to the check-ins — which based on discussions and answers to the survey, seemed to be partially attributable to a lack of core contributor work in some areas. There are governance discussions about this scheduled for the conference
- I want more visibility into the development/support status of components, especially MFEs. If a legacy frontend is being rewritten as an MFE, I think there should be a DEPR ticket for the legacy frontend from the get-go.
- Discuss posts (Core contributors sprint & meetup) have helpful information, but I haven’t found the time to read through them thoroughly. So I should include that as part of my CC tasks. I reviewed a PR (since it fixed an issue I was having) and then realized it already had an assignee on the Jira board (I then @ the assignee to let him know). What should we do in that case?
To follow-up on some of the points from the check-ins:
@mgmdi Thanks for offering! You’re in luck, there is also a call for help right above by @kmccormick about this, mentioning how to do that:
This is important btw, so bumping it for all core contributors ^^
@Eden_Huthmacher you might be the right person to answer this? Not sure if there is much that can be done though, it’s tough to find a time slot that can work for everyone.
@kmccormick +1, that would avoid a lot of surprises – this way the discussions about it can happen when the decision is taken, and while those who would prefer another option to jump in while it can still be changed. And if someone takes over the maintenance to avoid the deprecation, they have time to properly prepare.
This was discussed during the contributors meetup today, where it prompted a good conversation about this (cf the meeting notes when they will be posted).
Action item: @feanil will add an agenda item to next deprecation working group meeting to continue it.
@mgmdi We also discussed this quickly during the contributors meetup today, and it’s completely fine to review PRs you’re not assigned to! It can only add to it, and the assignee is likely to be happy to have work already done – and can either review something else, or just comment on the specific points that they see. It’s worth pinging the assignee to let them know though
Adding a little more, @jmakowski is also working on bridging the gap by investigating what work is (and will) be done by 2U and adding it to the project roadmap.
@antoviaque I am open to changing the meeting time of the Translation WG. Please email me time options that would work best and I will obtain consensus from the group.
Thank you @kmccormick and @antoviaque for the call. This has already been fruitful with @mgmdi and others offering to take on some test cases/tickets. Pierre informed me that @ghassan was already promoting such an idea so I’ve added him to the test team too in hope that he will be pleased
Ned Bachelder (2U)
Kyle McCormick (tCRIL)
Pierre Mailhot (EDUlib)
Régis Behmo (Tutor)
Xavier Antoviaque (OpenCraft)
Peter Pinch (MIT Open Learning)
Kaleb Abebe (MIT Open Learning)
Maria Grimaldi (eduNEXT)
Ghassan Maslami (independent)
Dean Jay Mathew (ABC Online Courses)
On Monday during the BTR-WG meeting I’ll briefly demo the draft Test Plan that I along with Pierre, Peter, Kaleb and Ghassan have contributed to developing so far.
There will be a simple leaderboard for testers so we can have some fun so I urge everyone to join Monday’s meeting if possible to get started early.
Together, we’re going to have a superb test plan moving forwards, especially with such a huge team brewed in just a single sprint!
That sounds great @Dean I will add the next BTR meeting on my calendar, and will do my best to attened*, but in anycase I am willing to devote time for testing Nutmeg.
* Recently my schedule/availability got messy because of Ramadan .